Quantcast
Channel: Bogleheads.org
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 4391

Personal Finance (Not Investing) • New S CORP owner

$
0
0

When the owner/employee also has a separate fulltime W2 job through which they hit the social security tax cap (like with the OP). In that case, with an S-Corp, the business will still pay the employer side of social security taxes in addition to both sides of the medicare tax.
Hello avalpert1,
If OP hits the S.E.T. cap at the full time job the S-Corp would not be liable for any SS tax AFAIK.
That is incorrect. Both employers must pay even if the employee hits the cap (for a variety of reasons not the least of which being how would you choose which employer doesn't have to).
In addition to this if OP did have any S-Corp SS liability one way or the other, OP could eliminate his payroll taxes by taking distributions (instead of income) if he has any retained earnings.
An S-Corp owner must pay themselves a reasonable salary, they cannot take all income as a distribution instead.
avalpert1,
That is incorrect. Both employers must pay even if the employee hits the cap (for a variety of reasons not the least of which being how would you choose which employer doesn't have to).
Presumably his primary employer would pay it. OP can wait and pay himself at the end of the year if he wants. By then his employer would have submitted the payroll taxes.
Who gets to decide which employer is the 'primary' one, why should the sequencing of payments be determinant...

In any case, the questions are moot since the law requires both employers to withhold social security taxes up to the point where they have paid the employee the amount of the social security cap. There is a provision that allows the employee to claim a refund of any excess amount above their own cap (26 USC 6413(c)(1) if you are interested) but no such provisions exists for employers.

You lack familiarity the relevant laws, I'd suggest you not offer advice in this area as I'm sure you wouldn't want to mislead people.
An S-Corp owner must pay themselves a reasonable salary, they cannot take all income as a distribution instead.
"Reasonable" is a gray area.
Sure, but not without boundaries - and 0% is clearly on the other side of the boundary (that is quite clear from court precedents).

Statistics: Posted by avalpert1 — Mon Aug 19, 2024 5:33 pm — Replies 56 — Views 2590



Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 4391

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>