Ah, got it. I don't read that much into a particular case not being included. (Though I could argue that it could also not be included because it's complicated, or too similar to his example 5. It'd all just be speculation, though.)He doesn't. That's my point. If he thought it warranted an explanation, I assume he would have provided another example or discussed the variation in one of the five examples he did provide. Frankly, it's not a close call.Where does he opine on OP's scenario?As for me, I agree wholeheartedly with rkhusky: The correct answer is so obvious that even Kaye Thomas — who takes such great care to make confusing circumstances clear even for wash sale novices — didn't think the case warranted any explanation.
Did you check out the link to that other forum? Notice any familiar explanations?
And yes I read it.
Statistics: Posted by AnEngineer — Sun Mar 17, 2024 7:50 pm — Replies 58 — Views 2744