I agree; it is as if my dentist billed me separately for part of his electric bill, or his assistant salary.Agree that it doesn't change the OP's question, but this stuff really irks me.
It's not my responsibility to independently subsidize a restaurant's employee benefits. I am already doing so by choosing to dine there and pay for my meal. I take great exception to a merchant changing the price of the meal after the fact, regardless of how euphemistically it is characterized.
If this happened to me, I would push back then and there. If they refused to remove it, I would never go back.
Yet, you can't dine out in SF unless you pay the "city of SF health mandate" and that would be a big loss.
Statistics: Posted by Thesaints — Thu Sep 12, 2024 10:59 pm — Replies 40 — Views 2148