Quantcast
Channel: Bogleheads.org
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 4479

Investing - Theory, News & General • Jason Zweig on Bonds vs Bond Funds

$
0
0
I asked this question: viewtopic.php?t=421818

I don't think it can be mathematically proven that holding a bond fund to its duration ensures that you will not lose your principal. That is the advantage of a bond ladder. You know exactly what you get.

I view a bond fund as an investment tool, which may lose value, and has a different correlation than other asset classes.

I have stopped saying that a person will get they principal back if they keep their bond fund as long as the maturity duration. It cannot be proven.
Holding a bond fund to its duration does not guarantee that you will not lose your principal - fund value could drop at any point. Holding for the duration from a price drop / yield increase and reinvesting will guarantee that you don't lose from that price drop.

The issue isn't bonds (or bond ladders) v. funds, it's portfolios with a more or less constant duration (such as a fund or rolling ladder) v. a portfolio with a constantly declining duration (such as an individual bond or non-rolling ladder).

Statistics: Posted by exodusing — Sat Apr 27, 2024 5:34 am — Replies 55 — Views 3650



Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 4479

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>